🀄 Is The Leopard 2 Better Than The Abrams

Hedil Hernandez. There’s a good reason it might take months —even the better part of a year—for Ukraine to get those first 31 M-1A2 Abrams tanks from the United States. Vehicle-maker General (b) in many countries operating the Leopard 2 or M1A2, the loader has 11 seconds to reload, when firing on the move — whereas the T-90/T-72 series has an auto loader — training for a Leopard 2 tank commander or a Leopard platoon commander needs another 9 weeks (after the basics short course), if they are to be tactically competent to fight The Leopard 2 also features a 120 mm cannon as its main armament, like the Abrams, making it equally potent as its American rival. The armor is also made up of 3rd generation composite which also includes high-hardness steel. Despite the large cannon and the very capable armor, the Leopard 2 is lighter than the Abrams. Much lighter. The Leopard 2A4—the most likely variant to be sent to Ukraine—has a top forward speed of around 42.2 miles per hour, and 19.2 miles per hour in reverse. The 2A4 weighs around 52 tons empty A broad number of things grouped under "fightability," or how effectively the crew could use the tank's features in combat. We didn't like the entire commander's position of the Abrams, the arrangement of controls for any of the crew, really, and considered Leopard 2 to be better in this regard than either Abrams or the prototype Challenger 2. The Leopard 2 and Abrams are fairly similar in capability, coming in various models weighing 60-70 tons.Both are bigger and better protected than Russian tanks, with far more sophisticated sensors Recently forty T-90Ms, the latest variant of the T-90, were reported to be ready for delivery in the near future to combat units. Similar to the M1A2 SEP v3, this is an upgrade kit that builds The Leopard 2 has for several decades stood among the top main battle tanks in the world, alongside the American M1 Abrams. Both vehicles share potent Rheinmetall 120-millimeter guns, boast It's very good. You could go into a very long and complicated technical specifications discussion, but at the end of the day those comparisons don't really give you an accurate call on whether the vehicle is better or worse than its NATO compatriots in the Abrams and Leopard 2. Vehicle performance at the end of the day heavily depends on crew Many other nations chimed in with contributions of Leopards, and Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany announced a joint project to deliver the older Leopard 1 tanks. Between the Abrams, Leopards Weighing in at 59 tons, the fully-digitized Panther features a 130 mm cannon, compared with a 120 mm weapon on the Leopard 2, the German Army’s go-to tank since the 1980s. The larger, heavier Leopard 2A4: 139 Germany: Some of the existing Leopard 2A4's are equipped with Israeli made Urdan mine rollers. Leopard 2A6: 100 Germany: In total, 100 used Leopard 2A6 tanks were delivered from the Netherlands by the end of 2019. France: Leclerc: 406 France: 184 in storage. 200 will be upgraded to XLR-standard. Murray didn't mention the Chinese Type 99, German Leopard 2, or Japanese Type 10 tanks. The general was answering a question, not reading a prepared statement, so his remarks were somewhat off-the HESH rounds are particularly suited for rifled cannon, but this means Challengers need a different type of ammunition than the Abrams and Leopard 2, which can share some ammo. The announcement by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz that he will send Leopard 2 tanks was coupled with an announcement from US President Joe Biden that he was providing 31 M1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine HygUn.

is the leopard 2 better than the abrams